Abstracts Engineering

Comparing the Effects of Flexibility Options on Conventional and Low-temperature District Heating Networks : Studying the potential of the next generation of district energy systems

by Mario Nithyanathan

District heating (DH) systems have been commonplace in Europe for over a century. These systems have undergone an evolution since their conceiving, and today we are at the precipice of the next major transition from the third-generation district heating system (3GDH) to the fourth generation (4GDH). Current 3GDH systems operate at a supply temperature in-between 80 °C - 100 °C and a return temperature of around 45 °C. Future 4GDH systems will operate at a supply temperature below 70 °C and return temperature as low as 25 °C, and therefore, will integrate waste heat available at low temperatures, and renewable heat sources.The literature review performed here shows that low temperature DH (LTDH) systems have several benefits over their conventional temperature DH (CTDH) predecessor and achieve lower operating costs for some technologies when compared to the CTDH alternative. Therefore, in this thesis, a TIMES (The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System) model is used to simulate the operation of a DH system. The learnings from the literature review were incorporated into the model so that certain operational differences between CTDH and LTDH systems could be compared.In this context, the aim of this project is to analyse the effects of flexibility options on the operation of a DH system, and to compare these effects between CTDH and LTDH systems. Flexibility options in DH systems are technologies and concepts that work towards balancing heat generation and demand in thermal grids and can also help balance power generation and demand in electrical grids. Examples of flexibility options are thermal energy storage (TES) tanks, and seasonal energy storages (e.g., borehole TES (BTES), caverns (CTES), and pits (PTES)). These flexibility options have already been implemented in varying amounts in today’s CTDH systems and will therefore have to provide the same service with LTDH systems in the future.As part of the REWARDHeat project (grant agreement No. 857811), the Swedish city of Helsingborg was used as the case-study in this thesis. The city’s heating sector was incorporated into a TIMES heat model and simulated for the period 2017 to 2052. The existing CTDH system model was then adapted to a LTDH system model and simulated for the same time horizon. Both the CTDH model and LTDH model were simulated for a case with TES available and then for a case where TES was not available, to better-identify the flexibility benefits. The effect of electricity prices on the operation of the system was also studied, where one case uses electricity prices that are on the conservative (i.e., higher) side and another on the ambitious (i.e., lower) side. This means that a total of eight scenarios were simulated and analysed.The results show that more heat storage capacity is utilised in the LTDH system due to TES technologies having lower heat losses. Also, it was found that peak shaving was more pronounced in the LTDH system. This is due to more base heat supply in the system from more excess heat, and from STES discharging. This means that the…