Abstracts Law

Add abstract

Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!

Search abstract

Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution

Share this abstract

Intersectionality as a tool to adjudicate human rights law; A case study on the Inter-American System of Human Rights

by Paulina Jimenez Fregoso

Institution: University of Essex
Department: School of Law
Degree: phd
Year: 2022
Keywords: H Social Sciences (General); K Law (General)
Posted: 3/25/2025
Record ID: 2287650
Full text PDF: https://repository.essex.ac.uk/32498/


Abstract

Intersectionality is currently used in international human rights law adjudication primarily due to the influence of feminist approaches to international law. The application of intersectionality ranges from being included in soft law to being used as a tool in adjudicative processes. However, there is no clear understanding of how intersectionality is being conceptualised in human rights, nor is there any clear understanding as to how, when, and why intersectionality is being used as a tool to adjudicate rights. Nowadays, the use of intersectionality in human rights law is being developed independently of the discussions and debates of the same theory that are taking place amongst feminist scholars. Using the works of Kimberlé Crenshaw and other key contemporary intersectional feminist scholars, this thesis critically analyses the concept of intersectionality as used both in feminist theory and in international human rights law as a means through which to better understand the use of the concept in international human rights law. The concept of intersectionality currently applied in human rights law is reworked to provide a clearer understanding of what this theory can and should entail when applied at law. Seeking to understand the implications of the concept as applied, the present work proposes an operationalisation process of intersectionality to be used in adjudicative processes. With a special focus on the Inter-American System of Human Rights and drawing on two key case studies, the research demonstrates how human rights adjudicative processes can benefit from using intersectionality as a tool to assess the different qualitative experience of harm of a victim oppressed by different systems simultaneously. This thesis contributes to knowledge through its analysis of intersectionality as understood in both human rights law and within applied feminist theory and provides a model of how intersectionality can be better understood and used to better deliver justice.

Add abstract

Want to add your dissertation abstract to this database? It only takes a minute!

Search abstract

Search for abstracts by subject, author or institution

Share this abstract

Relevant publications

Book cover thumbnail image
Time for the Appeal Tribunal in Investment Arbitra... Lessons from WTO and Transitioning to the New Era
by Dulger, Ahmet
   
Book cover thumbnail image
Identifying Juvenile Firesetters A Survey of the Operating Procedures, Risk Assessm...
by Mastrangelo, Arthur
   
Book cover thumbnail image
Implicity of Electronic Contract Formation With Reference to Email and Website
by Malik, Taimur
   
Book cover thumbnail image
Prisons in the Neoliberal Era Class and Symbolic Dimensions
by Koros, Dimitris
   
Book cover thumbnail image
The Applicable Law to International Commercial Con... With a Special Emphasis on Choice of Law Rules in ...
by Elcin, Mert
   
Book cover thumbnail image
Incapacitating the Innocent An Investigation of Legal and Extralegal Factors A...
by Webb, Patrick R.
   
Book cover thumbnail image
Reasons for Disclosure in the Physician-Patient Re... How Physician Conduct and Reimbursement Methodolog...
by Johnson, Kathleen
   
Book cover thumbnail image
The Contribution of Natural Law Theory to Moral an...
by Paterson, Craig